295
10 15:26.
Excellency had apparently come to the conclusion that the Chief Justice should be consulted as to appointments, the full meaning of that conclusion was not appreciated. It is clear from Your Excellency's despatch of 6th. Time to the Secretary of State that the baneful influence of the old tradition was still at work: but now, as it is happily removed, I feel sure that the intimate connexion between the two branches of the discussion will on reflexion become clear. The position can be stated with great clearness.
The Chief Justice must be consulted with regard to appointments in the Registry, because he is responsible for the administration of justice, in which the efficacy of the Registry is an important factor: He must also have the ultimate control of the Registry for the same reasons.
The paragraphs 13-15 of my letter are not data for re-consideration of the question by the Secretary of State: they are statements of fact which shew that no other position than the one I have taken up is tenable: a position which, in so far as it concerns changes in the distribution of work in the registry by the Chief Justice, if he thinks it advisable, is with deference to Your Excellency fully corroborated by the sentence in Sir M. Nathan's letter of 26th. June, 1905, to which I have referred.
bes
295
10 15:26.
Excellency had apparently come to the conclusion that the
.aminta bre avete ab. 03
od eldiazoq
Chief Justice should be consulted as to appointments,
the
full meaning of that conclusion was not appreciated. It is
LIA
*. vieoer Irtal10
to molteon
clear from Your Excellency's despatch of 6th. Time to the
Ali staveoanh no mi je ranit ja
A betonaca KitendJin sæd (noirigoq teftela ay dood
svad od toe! Inoxt two bellate oven biroo ! us batus ars
- SKG (Nitems woffot simɑle 380*
o DAY OF
شما نیا
Secretary of State that the baneful influence of the old
tradition was still at work: buz now, as it is happily
removed, I foel sure that the assis»de intimate connexion
between the two branches of the discussion will on
great clearness.
reflexion become clear. The position can be stated with
The Chief Justice must be consulter with regard to appointments in the Registry, because he is
responsible for the administration of justice, in which the
efficacy of the Aegistry is an important factor: He must
of h
diw noi.luo, Iand the buld taile Audi
De Lomakey: files at or
I FA
+ ns
also have the ultimate control of the megistry for the
Hans Mo.
to
I of ra berlitazon su or #date on bar!
same reasons.
@88090 ,tzalgag
8.
I * *
#wolfut I •* mund taɖef sdc
1V Dnert
SW GAW
ZIDNI 4 63 to bael
aa ni
I bo EwaROD
**
as com el mal Views attenteiqe” and rest bre
dale galankalo glen com! 90
03 02 et beskatnimi and
to one. £tud
Tuan Hoving ɛa yiyot n
es do mat es ei 1 .anol almen blo attoreffuori nuov
die, qiy Bild 1807 tnal emust
เมจ
vet mi sare.. la bun ing. by gav OSAS
The paragraphs 13 15 of my letter are not
data for re-consideration of the question by the Secretary
of State: they are statements of fact which shew that no
other position than the one I have taken up is tenable:
a position which, in so far as it concerns changes in the
distribution of work in the registry by the Chief Justice,
if he thinks it advisable, is with deference to Your
Excellency
-
-
fully corroborated by the sentence in Sir
M. Nathan's letter of 26th. June, 1905, to which I have
referred.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.